Back to Articles

— History

The Legacy of the Spanish Civil War

A retrospective on the brief, shining moment of horizontal organizing and collectivization in Catalonia before its brutal suppression.

By Free Press Collective

The Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) is often remembered as a struggle between fascism and democracy, or between Franco and the Republic. But for anarchists, it represents something far more significant: the most extensive attempt in history to implement libertarian socialist principles on a mass scale. In Catalonia and parts of Aragon, anarcho-syndicalist unions collectivized factories, farms, and public services, creating a society organized on principles of worker control, equal wages, and direct democracy. The experiment was brief, and it was crushed. But it demonstrated that anarchism is not a utopian fantasy but a practical politics capable of addressing the real problems of industrial society.

The CNT and the Revolutionary Moment

The Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT) was Spain's largest labor union, with over a million members by 1936. It was explicitly anarcho-syndicalist, committed to both the immediate defense of workers' interests and the revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the state. The CNT was not a political party. It was a union, organized by industry rather than craft, and it practiced direct action: strikes, boycotts, sabotage, and workplace occupations.

When the military coup led by General Francisco Franco erupted in July 1936, the Republican government was paralyzed. The CNT was not. Union militants organized armed resistance, seized weapons from barracks, and routed the fascist forces in Barcelona and much of Catalonia. In the process, they effectively abolished the existing state authority in the areas they controlled. The CNT became the de facto government of Catalonia, but it did not create a new state. Instead, it set about building a new society from below.

The Collectivization of Industry

Within weeks of the July uprising, CNT unions had collectivized virtually all of Barcelona's industry. Textile mills, metalworking shops, bakeries, transportation networks, and public utilities were placed under worker control. The old owners were either exiled or integrated into the new management committees. Production was organized through assemblies of workers, who elected recallable delegates to coordinate between factories. Wages were equalized, with the highest-paid workers earning only slightly more than the lowest-paid.

The results were remarkable. Despite the chaos of war, collectivized industry often increased production. The Barcelona textile industry, for example, reported higher output in the first months of collectivization than before the war. The transportation system, which had been plagued by inefficiency under private ownership, functioned smoothly. The workers' commitment to the enterprise was palpable: they were no longer alienated laborers working for someone else's profit, but participants in a collective project.

The Collectivization of Agriculture

In Aragon, where the CNT was particularly strong, the collectivization of agriculture went even further. Peasants voluntarily joined collective farms, pooling their land, tools, and livestock. The collectives were organized by village assemblies, which elected administrative committees. Production was coordinated regionally, with surplus from productive areas distributed to areas in need. The collectives also established schools, medical clinics, and cultural centers, providing services that had been absent under the old latifundia system.

The collectivization was voluntary, not forced. The CNT respected the rights of individual peasants who chose not to join. But the material benefits of the collectives — access to better tools, shared labor, and collective insurance — made them attractive. By 1937, approximately three-quarters of Aragon's agricultural land was collectivized. The British writer George Orwell, who fought with the PO militia in Aragon, described the collectives as "a state of affairs worth fighting for."

The Social Revolution

The Spanish anarchists understood that revolution was not merely a change in economic ownership but a transformation of social relations. The collectives abolished the rigid hierarchies of the old society. Women, previously confined to domestic labor, entered the factories and the militias. The anarchist feminist organization Mujeres Libres (Free Women) organized literacy classes, technical training, and consciousness-raising groups. The cultural life of the cities was revolutionized: theaters, cinemas, and cafes were collectivized, and new forms of art and music flourished.

The anarchists also implemented a radical education program. Schools were collectivized, and the curriculum was transformed to emphasize critical thinking, practical skills, and social solidarity rather than rote memorization and nationalist indoctrination. The CNT published newspapers, books, and pamphlets at a furious rate, seeking to raise the intellectual and political level of the working class. The goal was not merely to win the war but to create a new kind of human being, capable of self-governance and mutual cooperation.

The Betrayal

The Spanish anarchist experiment was destroyed not by the fascists alone, but by a coalition of enemies. The Communist Party, backed by the Soviet Union, sought to crush the anarchists and consolidate its own control over the Republican government. The Soviet secret police (NKVD) conducted a campaign of assassinations against anarchist leaders. The Republican government, increasingly dominated by the Communists, moved to restore state authority over the collectives, sending police to seize control of factories and dissolve the agricultural collectives.

The Western liberal democracies also played their part. Britain and France imposed a policy of "non-intervention," which prevented the Republic from purchasing arms while turning a blind eye to the massive German and Italian support for Franco. The United States, officially neutral, allowed American corporations to supply Franco with oil and trucks. The anarchists were isolated, betrayed by the Republic they had saved, abandoned by the democracies they had not threatened, and ultimately crushed by the combined forces of fascism, Stalinism, and liberalism.

The Lessons

The Spanish Civil War is often cited as proof that anarchism is impractical. But the evidence suggests the opposite. For two years, in the midst of a brutal war, anarchist principles proved capable of organizing industry, agriculture, and social life at scale. The collectives increased production, expanded education, and empowered women. The experiment failed not because of internal contradictions but because of external suppression.

The lessons are complex. The anarchists' decision to collaborate with the Republican government — a compromise that many anarchists opposed — proved fatal. By entering the government, they legitimized the very state they sought to abolish, and they placed themselves in a position where they could be outmaneuvered and destroyed. The historical lesson is not that anarchism is impossible, but that it cannot be achieved through compromise with the existing power structures. The state will not wither away; it must be actively dismantled. And those who seek to dismantle it must be prepared for the ferocity of the resistance they will encounter.

— End of History

Vol. 5 of the Anarchist Little Free Library